Yesterday
we discussed the myth of Barbareek aka Khatu Shyam Baba. There are some small
aspects of the same which are also quite interesting. Let us go through them.
One
small aspect of the myth is that post the battle of Kurukshetra, the Pandavas
started arguing amongst them as to who was responsible for the victory. After
much argument, Krishna, suggested that they ask the head of Barbareek as he had
had a ring-side view of the entire battle. On asking, Barbareek said that it
was Lord Krishna who was responsible for the victory as during the entire
battle his game-plan and his suggestions were crucial to the outcome of the whole
battle. From the height of the hilltop, all he could see was Lord Krishna’s sudarshan-chakra simply killing all the
enemies and Draupadi in the form of Ma Kali simply lapping up the blood of all
the enemies, not allowing a single drop to fall on the ground. To dig deeper in
this aspect, one can see two very strong suggestions. One is the supremacy of
Lord Krishna and the other is the prevalence of the cult of Mother Goddess. It
is said that the practice of offering a sacrifice before the battle was to
appease Ma Kali, who has always been associated with sacrifices and such
aspects. Finally, this also has traces of the myth of Raktabija (http://utkarshspeak.blogspot.in/2011/11/raktabija-demon.html ) where Goddess Kali does not allow
the drop of the demon to fall on the ground to avoid the multiplication of the
demon from the drops of his blood. In oral tradition of mythology, such mixing
up of myths is only human, is one guess. The other could be a harmonious
co-existence of different cults at a given time.
We
have read earlier that when Krishna disguised as a Brahmin tested Barbareek’s
power of the arrows, the arrow hovered around his foot, which had hidden a
leaf. Another version says that the arrow actually pierced his foot and had
made it a vulnerable zone. Another version says that Lord Krishna had got a
boon from Sage Durvasa (the sage known more for his curses than boons!) that
his entire body would be immune to weapons except his foot. Later we have read
about the death of Lord Krishna by being struck by an arrow of a hunter in his
foot which he had mistaken to be the face of a deer. This aspect of the myth is
similar to the famous Greek myth of Achilles and his vulnerable spot, his heel.
Achilles was a brave hero in the Greek mythology who was invincible except for
his vulnerable spot, his heel. He meets his end, by being struck by a poisonous
arrow in his heel. Quite a few similarities, I guess!
A Painting depicting the sacrifice of Barbareek |
Finally
the justification of Lord Krishna asking for the sacrifice! According to one
version, once Lord Brahma and other gods approached Lord Vishnu to complain to
him about the evil on earth and how wickedness was all over and innocent people
were not being allowed to live in peace. They urged Lord Vishnu to do something
to eradicate this evil. Hearing this, a Yaksha spoke out of turn and said that
for these kind of acts, he himself was enough and it did not quite require the
help of Lord Vishnu. Lord Brahma was insulted at his impudence and cursed him
that whenever he reached a stage of eliminating all evil on earth, Lord Vishnu
would end up killing him first. Barbareek was the same Yaksha in the later
birth and Krishna was only doing what was pre-destined! This is an interesting
aspect of myth-making. On the face of it, it seemed that Lord Krishna had been
unfair to a brave hero and got him eliminated. He would have supported the
Pandavas and would ensure the victory of the Pandavas. Some skeptics would say
that Krishna did so to avoid all credit going to Barbareek if it so happened and
thus got him eliminated, even when he was related to the Pandavas and was going
to fight from their right side. Some of these thoughts are of modern-day
thinking.
Epics
are never like a once-written novel, where all instances are sequential. In the
oral tradition, many aspects get inserted based on the orator, his preference
and his biases as well as that of his audience. It is highly probable that this
aspect of the Yaksha has been an afterthought when the hero of the story (Lord
Krishna) begins to be misunderstood especially for his seeking the head of
Barbareek. This could be an individual’s perception or a common notion. This
aspect also highlights the process or the rationale of myth-making.
Next time we will read about a similar myth, prevalent in South India.
Keep reading....