A Blog on Mythology and occasionally on Reality.


This is a Blog on Mythology, both Indian and World and especially the analysis of the myths.

In effect, the interpretation of the inherent Symbolism.


Pages

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

World Environment Day



Today is World Environment Day. Is the concept of Environment a relatively new idea, or did it always exist?

Is the concept of environment anti-modernism? Should we give up AC’s and deodorants for the sake of environment? Should we shut down industrial units, just because they are polluting and some marine life is endangered? Should we stop providing shelter for people, just to allow some marshes in the neighbourhood?

No environmentalists will tell you to endure any of the above. All s/he will tell you to do is be more sensitive to environment and leave the universe a better place to live for the next generation. This is not a new concept; our ancient texts had thought through this and laid down a few guidelines for the same.

The Veda’s have laid down principles for the conservation of natural resources, importance to the environment, welfare of plant and animal life, etc.

Here are some references to the same:

Habitation

  1. One should protect habitation. (Rig Veda Samhita vi-71-3)
  2. Waters as friends of man give full protection to his progenies. (Rig Veda Samhita vi-50-7)


Animal welfare

  1. One shall take care of quadrupeds (Taittiriya Samhita iv-4-10)
  2. One shall be auspicious to animals (Taittiriya Samhita ii-3-14)
  3. One shall not find fault with animals (Chandogya Upanishad ii-18-2)


Plant Life Welfare

  1. One should not destroy trees (Rig Veda Samhita vi-48-17)
  2. Plants are mothers and Goddesses (Rig Veda Samhita x-97-4)
  3. Trees are homes and mansions (Rig Veda Samhita x-97-5)
  4. Sacred grass has to be protected from man's exploitation (Rig Veda Samhita vii-75-8)
  5. Plants and waters are treasures for generations (Rig Veda Samhita vii-70-4)


Non-pollution

  1. Waters represent splendour (Atharva Veda Samhita iii-13-5)
  2. Waters bear off all defilement and cleanse people. (Vajasaneya Samhita iv-2)
  3. Whoever injures the essence of food, wine or steeds is a robber who sinks both himself and his offspring into destruction. (Rig Veda Samhita vii-104-10)
  4. Offerings are dedicated to waters of wells, pools, clefts, holes, lakes, morasses, ponds, tanks, marshes, rains, streams, rivers and ocean. (Taittiriya Samhita vii-4-13)
  5. Waters and herbs should have no poison. (Rig Veda Samhita vi-39-5)
  6. Waters are to be freed from defilement. (Atharva Veda Samhita x-5-24)
  7. Waters cleanse humanity from the evil of pollution committed by it. (Atharva Veda Samhita xii-2-40)


Just because nature does not punish immediately, is it not imperative for us to follow the laws of nature? All of us know all about Global Warming, but it needs to graduate beyond the level of holding a coffee-table discussion, and marking a day to ‘celebrate’ a day in the name of Environment.

In the quest for modernity and profits, we are making a mess of our environment. Is it mere coincidence that our ancient thinkers had created gods like Prithvi (earth), Vayu (air) Ganga (river) Meru and Himalya (mountains), etc.? Plants and trees, fishes and other marine life, birds and animals, etc. have all been given the status of divinity. All this was probably just to impress upon people the significance and the importance of nature. Myths associated with them have been told only to impress upon us that if the laws of nature are meddled with, the results would not be favourable to mankind. (Bhoodevi running away in the form of a cow - This is Utkarsh Speaking: Chourasi Devonwali Gaay) We have instances of floods, droughts, etc. which only highlight the constant degradation of environment.

On this day, lets us all pledge to our little bit. Stop using plastic bags, plant a tree or sapling, waste less water, conserve rain water, etc. If nothing, let us try to atone for what we have done till now!

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Sampati



Continuing with untold stories of Ramayan, here is one more – the tale of Sampati.

Sampati, a vulture, is a relatively unknown character. However, his younger brother Jatayu is better known for making efforts to save Sita while she was being abducted by Ravan. But let’s begin the story from the very beginning.

Sampati and Jatayu were the mortal sons of Aruna, who was the brother of the famous Garuda, the mount of Lord Vishnu. Aruna was the charioteer of the Sun god. This pedigree made them special birds with large wingspans and the ability to soar high in the skies.

Once, the two of them decided to fly a race in the skies. As the race began, youth took over and without realising, they flew higher and higher. Soon they were reaching closer to the Sun. When Sun saw two specs closing in towards him, he turned his stare towards them. Sampati knew that they had flown too close and tried to dissuade Jatayu to turn back and give up the race. But the young Jatayu was soaring high. Seeing the Sun turn his glare towards them, in a moment, Sampati soared higher than Jatayu and covered him with his wings.

The Sun’s glare fell on Sampati, which burnt his wings, and soon he was heading towards the earth, as he had no wings left. Jatayu realised it all too late and he too followed his brother. In trying to save his brother, Sampati lost his wings.

Jatayu was concerned about his brother’s ability to hunt and feed himself since he had no wings. At this, Sampati is supposed to have said that since he won’t be able to hunt live animals, he would henceforth feed on dead ones. To this Jatayu vowed that since Sampati lost his wings trying to save him, he too would feed on dead animals only. It is said that since then all vultures feed on dead, unlike other birds of prey, who feed on live animals!

Coming back to the epic Ramayan, Sampati makes a fleeting appearance in the epic, unlike the heroic death of his brother Jatayu.

Before dying, Jatayu informed Ram, that he had seen Sita being kidnapped by someone in a flying chariot. Soon Ram sent a team of vanars to find Sita. The team comprising of Hanuman, Jambuvan, Angad, amongst others had reached the southern end of land and near the seashore, from where no land could be seen. The team was disappointed and lifeless and they collapsed near the shore. Sampati was watching them from a distance and was happy and joyously said that here was he hungry for so many days, and god has been kind to send him a dying army of monkeys to feast on!

Hearing this, Jambuvan remarked that life was so ironical. One vulture, Jatayu, gave up his life saving Sita, and here was another vulture trying to feast on the same set of people who are out to seek Sita. The name ‘Jatayu’ made Sampati approach Jambuvan, and asked him to tell him more about Jatayu.

All were surprised at this sudden change. Jambuvan
related the whole story of Jatayu had died trying to save Sita while she was being kidnapped. Sampati was both, proud and sad – proud to know what his brother did, and sad to hear that he was no more. Sampati then introduced himself and promised to help them. Sampati told them, that few days back he had seen the asura king Ravan take a hapless woman in his chariot across the sea, who must be the Sita they were looking for. Sampati was gifted with vision which could see long distances, and he could see Sita being held captive in the region of Lanka which was across the sea.

With this information, the search team went back with the news to Ram. Both the vulture-brothers contributed to the search of Sita. Jatayu told Ram about Sita being abducted and Sampati told the team that she was being held captive in Lanka.

Why then, have popular renditions of the epic focused only on Jatayu?


Saturday, June 1, 2013

Makaradhwaj



Last time we read about Hanuman vanquishing Mahiravan and analysed the myth for a better understanding. In the myth, we had mentioned about a character that Hanuman meets on his way to patala-loka, Makaradhwaj.
 
Idol of Makardhwaj in a village temple at Porbandar, Gujarat, India.
Makaradhwaj stops Hanuman as he is standing guard to the entrance to the patala-loka. He challenges Hanuman to a wrestling duel and says that he can enter only after defeating him in the duel. Hanuman agrees, but finds him a tough opponent. Hanuman is impressed by his strength, but at the end of a strong bout, defeats Makaradhwaj. After the duel, Hanuman asks him his name and wanted to know about his parents, who had given birth to such a strong child. Makardwaj said that he was the son of Hanuman!

Hanuman was puzzled, as he was a celibate and had never fathered a child. Makardwaj explained that after burning the city of Lanka with his tail, he had dipped himself in the sea. At that moment, a drop of his sweat fell in the water which was swallowed by a fish like reptile, makar. He was later found in the stomach of the animal and given to Mahiravan. Another version says that due to the intense heat generated in his body after burning Lanka, he took a dip in the sea and it was at this moment that he ejected his reproductive fluid which fell into the mouth of the reptile.

Seeing his tremendous strength, and since he was found in the stomach of a reptilian fish, he was named Makaradhwaj. Later he was entrusted with the task of guarding the fortress of Mahiravan. He did recognise his father, but he did not want to be accused of betraying Mahiravan, who had brought him up and trained him and had trusted him with an important task.

On losing his wrestling bout with Hanuman, he took Hanuman to the spot where Mahiravan was planning to sacrifice Ram and Lakshman. Later after killing Mahiravan, on the suggestion of Ram, Makardhwaj was made the king of the patala-loka, before they left the place.

The aspect of Makardhwaj is interesting. Hanuman, a known celibate fathering a son. This myth highlights the subject of supra-normal births, a subject by itself and a common factor in the study of mythology. Begetting a child from any body fluid was not an uncommon phenomenon in mythology. Many see this as yet another example of virgin birth while feminists could view this as a woman’s ultimate revenge on celibates!

Also, it is said that Makardhwaj had challenged Hanuman to a wrestling duel and had agreed to give him way, only if he defeated him in wrestling. This goes well with the image of Hanuman as the patron deity of wrestlers all over India, more so in the East.

The Jethwa community of Porbandar, Gujarat, claim their ancestry from Makardwhaj. According to them, they are the direct descendants of Jethi-dhwaja, the grandson of Makardhwaj. The Jethwas consider Hanuman to be their clan deity and the royal family even carries the image of Hanuman on their royal flag.
 
Machanu
The Thai Ramayan or Ramakien as it is better known has a slightly different version to this story. According to this, when Ram was trying to build a bridge across the sea for the army to reach Lanka, the stones would simply disappear in the sea, when dropped. This was happening due to the fishes who were removing them, under the guidance of the mermaid Sovann Macha. Sovann Macha incidentally was a daughter of Ravan. Later when Hanuman explained to her that the real reason of building the bridge was to rescue Sita, Sovann Macha, agreed. In due course she fell in love with Hanuman and soon she gave birth to a child, half fish and half man, named Machanu (Makardhwaj). In the Ramakien, Hanuman was not a celibate rather he was quite a ladies-man! (This is Utkarsh Speaking: Part 3 – Thai Ramayana )

Later Machanu was left on the shores of the sea, where he was found by a demon who trained him in martial arts. He was entrusted with the task of guarding the lake to the otherworld.

Unlike the Indian version, Machanu is not aware of Hanuman being his father, when he challenges him to a duel, but that is just a minor difference. Needless to say, that Machanu has been depicted very colourfully, just like the entire Ramakien.






Pics courtesy - Wikipedia

Friday, May 31, 2013

Mahiravan



Amongst many untold stories of Ramayan, the myth of Mahiravan and Ahiravan is one such story. Untold, as they get added in due course of time, or are specific to a culture while they remain unimportant for many. We will analyse this later, but first the story.



After, Ravan lost his brave son Indrajeet in the battle, he was crestfallen. His mother met him and reminded him of what he had done to his family and how he was wrong but his arrogance was not allowing him to see through the web woven by him. Ravan was not willing to listen to anything and from anybody.



Before leaving, his mother reminded him of one of his sons (some texts refer to him as brother), Mahiravan, who was ruling in the Patala-loka, or the underworld. Mahiravan had initially decided not to be a part of the battle, as he did not agree with the kidnapping of Sita. Mahiravan was the master of occult and was a devotee of Goddess Kali. Ravan managed to convince Mahiravan by telling him that if he could offer Ram and Lakshman as a sacrifice to the Goddess Kali, she would be happy.



When news of Mahiravan’s joining the battle reached the army of Ram, they were worried, especially Vibhishan, Ravan’s brother. Vibhishan knew about Mahiravan’s abilities to change forms due to his mastery in sorcery. He warned all to ensure that Ram and Lakshman were guarded well and appointed Hanuman to ensure that none got in the cottage of Ram and Lakshman. Hanuman created a shield by his tail, around the cottage where the two were resting and ensured that none could break the barricade.



Mahiravan tried many forms but could not pass through. At last, he assumed the form of Vibhishan and approached Hanuman. He asked him to be allowed in, just to ensure that Ram and Lakshman were fine. Hanuman, allowed him to pass without realising that he had just breached the security created by him. As soon as Mahiravan got in the cottage, he cast a spell on both Ram and Lakshman, and took them deep inside the ground. By the time Hanuman and Vibhishan could realise, they were gone. Vibhishan was very worried as he knew what could be the fate of the two. He urged Hanuman to do something.



Vibhishan explained that the two were taken deep inside the ground in the patala-loka and Hanuman should go the same way. The adventures of Hanuman in the patal-loka are interesting, but we will not get into the details of it. It is said that when Hanuman reached the patal-loka, it seemed to be a city by itself, with forts and fortresses and guards at every point. After eliminating all opposition on his way, he met one, who seemed to be quite a match for him. This character is known as Makardwaj. We will discuss Makardwaj in the next part of this article.
 

On his way to the patala-loka, Hanuman had heard that Mahiravan was going to sacrifice Ram and Lakshman to the Goddess Kali in return for more occult powers. The myth gets interesting here.



Hanuman takes the form of a small bee and approaches the goddess Kali. He asks her, if she wanted the blood of Ram. Kali is supposed to have said that she would rather have the blood of Mahiravan, than that of Ram. She then goes on to suggest a way out, which Hanuman whispers in the ears of Ram. Ram and Lakshman were readied for the sacrifice and at the auspicious time, Mahiravan asks Ram to put his head on the sacrificial altar and ready himself for the sacrifice. Ram said, that he had been a Kshatriya, a warrior, all his life and had never known how to bow in front of anyone, could Mahiravan show him how to bow? Mahiravan was irritated and tried to demonstrate. No sooner had he done that, Hanuman who was hiding behind the idol of Goddess Kali, assumes his form, takes the sacrificial blade and beheads Mahiravan. Thus Ram and Lakshman were saved. He then offered the blood of Mahiravan to the goddess.



Another interesting version adds that killing Mahiravan was not going to be that simple. His life was distributed in five different flames around the temple. If one flame was extinguished, it would come up again; so the flames had to be blown off all together to kill him. To achieve this task, Hanuman took the form of Panch-mukhi, or five-faced. By doing this, he could blow all the flames together, thus killing Mahiravan.



Matters don’t end here. Mahiravan’s wife was pregnant and it is said that when she came to know about the death of her husband, she joined the fight. In the commotion that is unleashed, Hanuman’s kick lands on her stomach and out comes their child, Ahiravan, ready to fight. Ahiravan is full of blood and mucous, and was tough to get hold of and was proving to be quite a tough match. Hanuman manages to throw some mud on him, gets his hand on Ahiravan’s limbs and dashes the child on the ground, killing him instantly.

Hanuman then carries both Ram and Lakshman back to the battle field.



This myth is found mainly in the Ramayans of the East, especially in the Bengali version by Krittibash, the passage better known as ‘Mahirabonerpala’. The involvement of Goddess Kali and the occult practices find a mention in the epic here. Also, Kali plays a positive role here and asks for the blood of Mahiravan. There are many aspects to this myth –



Both Hanuman and Mahiravan seem to have similar powers to change forms as we have seen, but both use it for different reasons. Hanuman’s role of the killer and a blood-thirsty one at that, especially the way the child Ahiravan is killed bears testimony to the tantric angle to this myth. A very different form of Hanuman, which has rarely been seen. Hanuman has always been portrayed in a submissive, but brave and strong disciple of Ram. Such violent form has seldom been portrayed, and this could be region or even audience specific.



The entire myth goes on to highlight the importance of Hanuman. In the entire episode, there has been no role in terms of action from Ram and Lakshman. Very clearly this is a myth which goes on to add heroic credentials to Hanuman.



Many also see this as an aspect of ‘myth-making’ to justify the creation of the Panch-mukhi Hanuman, akin to creating the means, to justify the end. An important aspect of this Panch-mukhi Hanuman is the five faces. The five faces are that of Hanuman himself, and the other four being that of Hyagriva (horse), Varaha and Narasimha, all three being forms of Lord Vishnu and the final being that of Garuda, again a vahana of Vishnu. In this myth, Hanuman is given the importance of Lord Vishnu himself, which makes him at par with his Lord! While this is strange, such comparisons are not unheard of.



Also, keeping with the theme of the Bengali version of the epic, Ram plays a very passive role. A similar underlying theme can be found in the other neighbouring versions, like the Oriya, Assamese, etc. In the actual text, Ram is shown as crestfallen and is even scared at his predicament, when he is about to be sacrificed, a far cry from many other versions of the epic where he is the dynamic hero who gives the war cry.



Many scholars have opined that this has a folktale motif and has blended well in the epic. The changing of forms, sacrifices at the altar of Goddess Kali, etc. are very common folktale motifs in the East. The twist of the ‘sacrificer’ getting sacrificed is also a common folktale element, which highlights that gods don’t support their ardent devotees if they take the wrong path.



All in all, a very interesting myth.



Next time, we will continue this one with reference to Makardhwaj….. Keep reading…