At the onset, let me mention that this myth is trifle disturbing.
This tale is told by Bhishma while he was on the bed of arrows, to Yudhishtir,
during the war at Kurukshetra, in the Anushasan
Parva, of Mahabharata.
Oghavati, a princess was married to a learned sage, Sudarsana.
Sudarsana had vowed to conquer death without leaving the path of a householder.
He continued to lead a family life, while maintaining his vow. As a part of his
vow, he told his wife, Oghavati, that it was their prime duty to be of service
to any guest, whosoever came to their cottage, at whatever time and whatever be
his need or request. If that meant that she had to offer herself to him, then
so be it!
Death, who heard this, kept following Sudarsana wherever he went,
hoping to find a loophole in his vow. One day, when Sudarsana was out
collecting firewood, a Brahmin guest came to the cottage and sought to be
welcomed as a true householder would do. Oghavati welcomed him and offered him
water and comfort. She then asked if he needed anything more. The guest replied
that he wanted her and as part of the tradition, she should not object to it.
Oghavati, tried to offer other alternatives to keep her virtue, but the guest
was determined that nothing but her would suffice. It was at this moment, that
Oghavati remembered her husband’s words, and reluctantly gave in. Both the
guest and Oghavati went to bed together.
Just when the guest had finished making love, Sudarsana arrived and
called for Oghavati, but Oghavati was too ashamed to respond to him as she felt
that she was defiled and not worthy of her husband, as she was touched by
another man. After repeated calling for his wife, the guest from inside the
cottage replied that he was a guest and his wife was catering to his bodily
needs and that he would have to wait.
Death who was stalking Sudarsana found his chance of the vow being
broken and at the slightest tinge of anger or jealousy; it would club him to
death. But Sudarsana, without any tinge of jealousy replied that he would wait
till they were done and he also hoped that he had enjoyed the act. He also
mentioned that he was glad that he was of some help and service to the Brahman
guest.
Just then a gush of wind came from the cottage and he heard a voice
saying that the guest was none other than the Lord Dharma and that he had
arrived to test him and being pleased with him, Sudarsana had conquered death
(Dharma being same as Yama/Death). He further proclaimed that Oghavati was one
of the most chaste woman on earth and was protected by the virtues and
qualities of devotion to her husband. From then onwards, half of her would
remain with Sudarsana and the other half would flow as a river, named after
her, Oghavati (sometime mentioned as the river Sarasvati), which would help
people purify them of their sins.
I did mention at the onset that this was a trifle disturbing as a
myth. If we try to unravel the reason of this myth, then one can broadly
surmise that a guest is an important person and that he or she should be looked
after, as gods sometimes take the form of guests. This goes well with the
concept of Atithi devo bhava. So far
so good. But there are deeper connotations. To prove that god could take the
form of a guest and so the guest should be taken care of, there could have been
a rather different myth and not necessarily like the one above.
While Dr. S. Dange had dissected this myth very differently as a
study of human-morph, the union of river and fire, etc., 1 for me, the myth raises many an uncomfortable
question. Whose test was it, Sudarsana’s or Oghavati’s? By Oghavati reluctantly
offering herself to the guest, how did Sudarsana benefit (conquering of death)?
Was this perpetuated by a certain class of people to benefit them, as and when
they visit someone’s place?
If all myths have a social cause and the way it was told to
Yudhishtir, raises some more questions - Was this myth told to Yudhishtir to
extol the virtues of Dharma (who also happened to be Yudhishtir’s father)? Was
it told to justify the fame of the river Oghavati that bathing in it could rid
one of one’s sins, like they do with many other rivers? Did it imply that the
sacrifices of a wife could lead to virtues for the husband? Or simply put, did
it hint at a case for sex hospitality?
The last seems to be an issue which has a number of cases in
Mahabharata, the other being the case of Kunti. Kunti was left to serve Sage
Durvasas for a year and she was told that no request, whatsoever, of the sage
should be turned down. She was rewarded with an incantation to call for any god
when she wanted to. Why would a learned sage give such a ‘blessing’ to a virgin
girl? Wasn’t it out of place, even if we see it as a need of the narrative
later?
Many have said that the tale of Oghavati directly and that of Kunti
indirectly hinted at the presence of sex hospitality in the society, which
probably suited a certain class of people and extolling virtues could only make
their demands more acceptable, even if there was reluctance. Not to be overlooked
is the fact that in both the cases, the guests were Brahmins.
Mahabharat raises many questions, and quite often uncomfortable
ones. Not all have answers. The authors of such epics probably wanted people at
different times to discuss them and arrive at their own answers, suiting the
milieu, if it does at all!
1 Myths from
Mahabharat, By Dr. S. Dange
No comments:
Post a Comment